iShares Global Clean Energy ETF ICLN

Este fondo te permite invertir en empresas globales productoras de energía solar, eólica y otras fuentes renovables, siguiendo el índice S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Administrado por BlackRock.

Con 58 acciones de ICLN (USD 994,41) habrías recibido USD 11,02 en dividendos en los últimos 12 meses.

• The Motley Fool 23 sept

  Better Energy Sector ETF: Vanguard's VDE Focused on Oil and Gas vs. the iShares ICLN Targeting Clean Energy

  The Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) represent opposite ends of the energy spectrum. VDE focuses on traditional U.S. oil and gas giants with a 46.8% one-year return, lower expense ratio (0.09%), higher dividend yield (2.3%), and greater stability. ICLN targets international renewable energy with higher growth potential but experienced a 57.2% maximum drawdown and declining performance in 2026 due to unfavorable Trump Administration policies toward renewables.

  

• The Motley Fool 14 sept

  Better Clean Energy ETF: Broad Exposure Through iShares' ICLN vs. Invesco's Solar-Focused TAN

  The article compares two clean energy ETFs: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). ICLN offers broader diversification across 105 companies with a lower expense ratio (0.38% vs 0.7%), lower volatility (beta 1.09 vs 1.40), and includes a dividend yield. TAN provides concentrated solar-only exposure with 36 holdings. The analysis recommends ICLN for most investors seeking diversification and cost efficiency, while TAN suits those specifically targeting the solar sector.

  

• The Motley Fool 15 ago

  Which Is the Better Energy ETF: State Street's Fossil Fuel XOP or iShares' Clean Energy ICLN?

  The article compares two energy ETFs with opposite strategies: XOP focuses on traditional fossil fuel producers with lower expenses (0.35%) and higher dividend yield (1.8%), while ICLN targets clean energy with 105 holdings and ESG screening. Over 5 years, XOP significantly outperformed ICLN ($2,517 vs $868 on $1,000 invested), though ICLN has rebounded recently as clean energy valuations normalized. XOP is recommended for income-focused investors seeking proven returns, while ICLN suits those betting on long-term energy transition.

  

• The Motley Fool 25 jul

  For Energy Investors, Is a Traditional Energy ETF a Better Bet Than Clean Energy?

  The article compares State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE), which focuses on traditional fossil fuels, with iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN), which invests in renewable energy companies. XLE offers lower fees (0.08% vs 0.39%), higher dividend yield (2.60% vs 1.00%), and lower volatility, while ICLN provides greater diversification and exposure to the growing renewable energy sector. The author recommends ICLN for long-term investors who can tolerate near-term volatility, citing the macro trend toward renewable energy and superior 10-year returns.